A series of recent developments are renewing questions about the Catholic bishops' alignment with the Republican Party, with much of the attention focusing on comments by Philadelphia Archbishop Charles Chaput, who said he "certainly can't vote for somebody who's either pro-choice or pro-abortion."
So it's a priest is anti-choice - ok. And he's using his position as a Catholic priest to argue against voting for any candidate who is pro-choice - ok, we've seen that before.
But then comes this:
In a wide-ranging interview published last week (Sept. 14), Chaput also echoed the views of a number of prominent bishops when he praised Republican vice presidential nominee Paul Ryan for trying to address the "immoral" practice of deficit spending through his libertarian-inflected budget proposals.
"Jesus tells us very clearly that if we don't help the poor, we're going to go to hell. Period. There's just no doubt about it," Chaput told National Catholic Reporter.
"But Jesus didn't say the government has to take care of them, or that we have to pay taxes to take care of them. Those are prudential judgments. Anybody who would condemn someone because of their position on taxes is making a leap that I can't make as a Catholic."
Right - so it's ok to use the government, as a Christian, to impose your "morality" on women on something the bible says nothing about (reproductive freedom) - but it's not ok to use the government to help the poor, which Jesus "very clearly" said to do.
Please, Archbishop Chaput, tell me about "rendering unto Caesar" and camels, rich people, and needles - if you can take time from your libertarian quest, that is.
(h/t digby)
No comments:
Post a Comment